首页> 外文OA文献 >Verkliga vardagssammanhang i årskurs 4 eller kontextlös kunskap i årskurs 8? : Everyday life context in grade 4 or knowledge without context in grade 8
【2h】

Verkliga vardagssammanhang i årskurs 4 eller kontextlös kunskap i årskurs 8? : Everyday life context in grade 4 or knowledge without context in grade 8

机译:4年级的真实日常情境还是8年级的无情境知识? :四年级的日常生活情境或八年级的无情境知识

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

International comparisons of students’ knowledge as TIMSS and PISA have shown that Swedish students' knowledge of science deteriorated during the 2000s, compared to both previous years and to other countries. In grade 4, however, the results improved between 2007 and 2011 and Sweden is one of the countries showing the greatest difference between the results in grade 4 and grade 8, suggesting a weak knowledge development in science between these grades. This study compares Swedish pupils' results for individual tasks in Science in TIMSS 2011 with an average score of countries in the EU or OECD. The items are classified by whether they are put in a context and if they ask for school specific knowledge or if they could be solved with knowledge from sources outside school. A large proportion of the items in grade 4 is linked to a context and to students' everyday lives, which explains the good results for the younger students.  Few items in grade 8 are of interest for the students or linked to students' daily lives and on these items Swedish students often perform below average for the EU / OECD, which contributes to the less favorable outcome in grade 8. The weak development of knowledge between grades 4 and 8 that is indicated by TIMSS suggests that the formalized science classes in school do not reach the students and it points to the need for a clearer connection to students' interests and experiences.
机译:TIMSS和PISA对学生知识的国际比较表明,与往年和其他国家相比,瑞典学生在2000年代的科学知识有所下降。但是,四年级的成绩在2007年至2011年之间有所改善,瑞典是四年级和八年级成绩差异最大的国家之一,表明这些年级之间的科学知识发展较弱。这项研究将瑞典学生在TIMSS 2011中完成科学方面的个别任务的结果与欧盟或OECD国家的平均分数进行了比较。根据是否将它们放置在上下文中,是否要求学校特定知识或是否可以使用校外来源的知识来对这些项目进行分类。四年级的大部分项目都与环境和学生的日常生活相关,这为年轻的学生提供了很好的成绩。很少有8年级的项目对学生感兴趣或与学生的日常生活相关,瑞典学生在EU / OECD上的表现通常低于平均水平,这导致8年级的学习成绩较差。 TIMSS指出的4年级和8年级之间的差距表明,学校中正规的科学课没有覆盖学生,这表明需要与学生的兴趣和经验建立更清晰的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号